Azure Database for MySQL vs BigQuery

MySQL with a Microsoft hug—managed so you don't have to babysit your database meets google's data warehouse that makes querying petabytes feel like a casual stroll, as long as you don't mind the bill. Here's our take.

Azure Database for MySQL

Nice Pick

MySQL with a Microsoft hug—managed so you don't have to babysit your database.

Pros

• Fully managed with automated backups and patching
• High availability built-in with flexible server options
• Seamless integration with other Azure services
• Strong security features like encryption and firewall rules

Cons

• Can get pricey compared to self-hosted MySQL
• Limited control over underlying infrastructure

BigQuery

Google's data warehouse that makes querying petabytes feel like a casual stroll, as long as you don't mind the bill.

Pros

• Serverless architecture means zero infrastructure management
• Blazing-fast SQL queries on massive datasets with Google's distributed processing
• Built-in machine learning and seamless integration with Google Cloud services

Cons

• Costs can spiral quickly with complex queries or large data scans
• Limited control over performance tuning compared to self-managed warehouses

The Verdict

Use Azure Database for MySQL if: You want fully managed with automated backups and patching and can live with can get pricey compared to self-hosted mysql.

Use BigQuery if: You prioritize serverless architecture means zero infrastructure management over what Azure Database for MySQL offers.

The Bottom Line

Azure Database for MySQL wins

MySQL with a Microsoft hug—managed so you don't have to babysit your database.