Dynamic

Azure SQL Database vs Azure Database for MySQL

SQL Server's cloud-bound cousin meets mysql with a microsoft hug—managed so you don't have to babysit your database. Here's our take.

🧊Nice Pick

Azure SQL Database

SQL Server's cloud-bound cousin. All the enterprise-grade features, none of the hardware headaches.

Azure SQL Database

Nice Pick

SQL Server's cloud-bound cousin. All the enterprise-grade features, none of the hardware headaches.

Pros

  • +Fully managed with automated backups and high availability
  • +Built-in intelligence for performance tuning and security
  • +Supports serverless compute and Hyperscale for massive scalability

Cons

  • -Can get pricey for high-performance workloads
  • -Limited to Microsoft SQL Server compatibility

Azure Database for MySQL

MySQL with a Microsoft hug—managed so you don't have to babysit your database.

Pros

  • +Fully managed with automated backups and patching
  • +High availability built-in with flexible server options
  • +Seamless integration with other Azure services
  • +Strong security features like encryption and firewall rules

Cons

  • -Can get pricey compared to self-hosted MySQL
  • -Limited control over underlying infrastructure

The Verdict

Use Azure SQL Database if: You want fully managed with automated backups and high availability and can live with can get pricey for high-performance workloads.

Use Azure Database for MySQL if: You prioritize fully managed with automated backups and patching over what Azure SQL Database offers.

🧊
The Bottom Line
Azure SQL Database wins

SQL Server's cloud-bound cousin. All the enterprise-grade features, none of the hardware headaches.

Disagree with our pick? nice@nicepick.dev