Azure SQL Database vs Azure Database for MySQL
SQL Server's cloud-bound cousin meets mysql with a microsoft hug—managed so you don't have to babysit your database. Here's our take.
Azure SQL Database
SQL Server's cloud-bound cousin. All the enterprise-grade features, none of the hardware headaches.
Azure SQL Database
Nice PickSQL Server's cloud-bound cousin. All the enterprise-grade features, none of the hardware headaches.
Pros
- +Fully managed with automated backups and high availability
- +Built-in intelligence for performance tuning and security
- +Supports serverless compute and Hyperscale for massive scalability
Cons
- -Can get pricey for high-performance workloads
- -Limited to Microsoft SQL Server compatibility
Azure Database for MySQL
MySQL with a Microsoft hug—managed so you don't have to babysit your database.
Pros
- +Fully managed with automated backups and patching
- +High availability built-in with flexible server options
- +Seamless integration with other Azure services
- +Strong security features like encryption and firewall rules
Cons
- -Can get pricey compared to self-hosted MySQL
- -Limited control over underlying infrastructure
The Verdict
Use Azure SQL Database if: You want fully managed with automated backups and high availability and can live with can get pricey for high-performance workloads.
Use Azure Database for MySQL if: You prioritize fully managed with automated backups and patching over what Azure SQL Database offers.
SQL Server's cloud-bound cousin. All the enterprise-grade features, none of the hardware headaches.
Disagree with our pick? nice@nicepick.dev