Dynamic

Babylon.js vs Three.js

Developers should learn Babylon meets developers should learn three. Here's our take.

🧊Nice Pick

Babylon.js

Developers should learn Babylon

Babylon.js

Nice Pick

Developers should learn Babylon

Pros

  • +js when building browser-based 3D applications, such as games, architectural visualizations, or educational simulations, as it offers high performance and extensive features without requiring plugins
  • +Related to: webgl, typescript

Cons

  • -Specific tradeoffs depend on your use case

Three.js

Developers should learn Three

Pros

  • +js when building interactive 3D web applications, such as product configurators, architectural visualizations, educational simulations, or browser-based games, as it provides a high-level abstraction over WebGL, reducing complexity and development time
  • +Related to: javascript, webgl

Cons

  • -Specific tradeoffs depend on your use case

The Verdict

These tools serve different purposes. Babylon.js is a framework while Three.js is a library. We picked Babylon.js based on overall popularity, but your choice depends on what you're building.

🧊
The Bottom Line
Babylon.js wins

Based on overall popularity. Babylon.js is more widely used, but Three.js excels in its own space.

Disagree with our pick? nice@nicepick.dev