Background Sync API vs IndexedDB

Developers should learn and use the Background Sync API when building web applications that require reliable data synchronization, such as messaging apps, form submissions, or content updates, especially in environments with poor or unstable internet access meets developers should learn indexeddb when building progressive web apps (pwas) or any web application that requires robust offline capabilities, such as note-taking apps, document editors, or media players. Here's our take.

Background Sync API

Nice Pick

Developers should learn and use the Background Sync API when building web applications that require reliable data synchronization, such as messaging apps, form submissions, or content updates, especially in environments with poor or unstable internet access

Pros

• It ensures that user actions aren't lost during offline periods and enhances the user experience by making apps feel more responsive and resilient
• Related to: service-workers, progressive-web-apps

Cons

• Specific tradeoffs depend on your use case

IndexedDB

Developers should learn IndexedDB when building progressive web apps (PWAs) or any web application that requires robust offline capabilities, such as note-taking apps, document editors, or media players

Pros

• It's essential for scenarios where users need to access and manipulate data without an internet connection, and for caching large datasets like product catalogs or user-generated content to reduce server load and latency
• Related to: javascript, progressive-web-apps

Cons

• Specific tradeoffs depend on your use case

The Verdict

These tools serve different purposes. Background Sync API is a concept while IndexedDB is a database. We picked Background Sync API based on overall popularity, but your choice depends on what you're building.

The Bottom Line

Background Sync API wins

Based on overall popularity. Background Sync API is more widely used, but IndexedDB excels in its own space.