Binary Logging vs Trigger Based Auditing

Developers should use binary logging when implementing database replication for high availability, scaling read operations, or disaster recovery scenarios, as it allows slave servers to stay synchronized with a master meets developers should use trigger based auditing when they need to enforce data integrity, meet regulatory compliance requirements (e. Here's our take.

Binary Logging

Nice Pick

Developers should use binary logging when implementing database replication for high availability, scaling read operations, or disaster recovery scenarios, as it allows slave servers to stay synchronized with a master

Pros

• It is also essential for point-in-time recovery after data corruption or accidental deletions, enabling restoration to a specific transaction
• Related to: mysql-replication, postgresql-replication

Cons

• Specific tradeoffs depend on your use case

Trigger Based Auditing

Developers should use Trigger Based Auditing when they need to enforce data integrity, meet regulatory compliance requirements (e

Pros

• g
• Related to: database-triggers, sql-server

Cons

• Specific tradeoffs depend on your use case

The Verdict

These tools serve different purposes. Binary Logging is a database while Trigger Based Auditing is a concept. We picked Binary Logging based on overall popularity, but your choice depends on what you're building.

The Bottom Line

Binary Logging wins

Based on overall popularity. Binary Logging is more widely used, but Trigger Based Auditing excels in its own space.