Dynamic

Bolt On Security vs Shift Left Security

Developers might use Bolt On Security when working with legacy systems that lack built-in security, or in scenarios where rapid prototyping prioritizes functionality over security initially meets developers should adopt shift left security to build more secure applications from the ground up, as it helps catch vulnerabilities early when they are cheaper and easier to fix, reducing the likelihood of costly breaches or rework. Here's our take.

🧊Nice Pick

Bolt On Security

Developers might use Bolt On Security when working with legacy systems that lack built-in security, or in scenarios where rapid prototyping prioritizes functionality over security initially

Bolt On Security

Nice Pick

Developers might use Bolt On Security when working with legacy systems that lack built-in security, or in scenarios where rapid prototyping prioritizes functionality over security initially

Pros

  • +However, it is not recommended for new projects, as it can lead to vulnerabilities, increased maintenance, and higher long-term costs compared to approaches like Security by Design or DevSecOps
  • +Related to: security-by-design, devsecops

Cons

  • -Specific tradeoffs depend on your use case

Shift Left Security

Developers should adopt Shift Left Security to build more secure applications from the ground up, as it helps catch vulnerabilities early when they are cheaper and easier to fix, reducing the likelihood of costly breaches or rework

Pros

  • +It is particularly valuable in agile and DevOps environments where rapid development cycles require continuous security integration, such as in cloud-native applications, microservices architectures, or compliance-driven industries like finance and healthcare
  • +Related to: devsecops, static-application-security-testing

Cons

  • -Specific tradeoffs depend on your use case

The Verdict

Use Bolt On Security if: You want however, it is not recommended for new projects, as it can lead to vulnerabilities, increased maintenance, and higher long-term costs compared to approaches like security by design or devsecops and can live with specific tradeoffs depend on your use case.

Use Shift Left Security if: You prioritize it is particularly valuable in agile and devops environments where rapid development cycles require continuous security integration, such as in cloud-native applications, microservices architectures, or compliance-driven industries like finance and healthcare over what Bolt On Security offers.

🧊
The Bottom Line
Bolt On Security wins

Developers might use Bolt On Security when working with legacy systems that lack built-in security, or in scenarios where rapid prototyping prioritizes functionality over security initially

Disagree with our pick? nice@nicepick.dev