Boost.Asio vs libuv
Developers should learn Boost meets developers should learn libuv when building cross-platform applications that require high-performance asynchronous i/o, such as web servers, real-time systems, or tools like node. Here's our take.
Boost.Asio
Developers should learn Boost
Boost.Asio
Nice PickDevelopers should learn Boost
Pros
- +Asio when building scalable network applications in C++ that require handling multiple connections concurrently, such as web servers, game servers, or real-time communication systems
- +Related to: c-plus-plus, networking
Cons
- -Specific tradeoffs depend on your use case
libuv
Developers should learn libuv when building cross-platform applications that require high-performance asynchronous I/O, such as web servers, real-time systems, or tools like Node
Pros
- +js, where it handles the underlying event loop
- +Related to: node-js, c-programming
Cons
- -Specific tradeoffs depend on your use case
The Verdict
Use Boost.Asio if: You want asio when building scalable network applications in c++ that require handling multiple connections concurrently, such as web servers, game servers, or real-time communication systems and can live with specific tradeoffs depend on your use case.
Use libuv if: You prioritize js, where it handles the underlying event loop over what Boost.Asio offers.
Developers should learn Boost
Disagree with our pick? nice@nicepick.dev