Bootstrap vs Astro

The web's favorite starter kit meets the framework that finally gets it: less javascript is more, especially when you can still use all your favorite toys. Here's our take.

Bootstrap

Nice Pick

The web's favorite starter kit. Because sometimes you just want your site to look good without reinventing the wheel.

Pros

• Massive component library for rapid prototyping
• Responsive grid system that just works
• Extensive documentation and community support
• Customizable with Sass variables

Cons

• Sites can look generic if not heavily customized
• Bloat from unused CSS if not properly optimized

Astro

The framework that finally gets it: less JavaScript is more, especially when you can still use all your favorite toys.

Pros

• Zero JavaScript by default for lightning-fast static sites
• Mix and match React, Vue, or Svelte components without framework lock-in
• Excellent SEO and performance out of the box
• Built-in support for islands architecture for partial hydration

Cons

• Can feel overkill for simple projects due to its component-heavy approach
• Limited real-time interactivity without manual JavaScript additions

The Verdict

Use Bootstrap if: You want massive component library for rapid prototyping and can live with sites can look generic if not heavily customized.

Use Astro if: You prioritize zero javascript by default for lightning-fast static sites over what Bootstrap offers.

The Bottom Line

Bootstrap wins

The web's favorite starter kit. Because sometimes you just want your site to look good without reinventing the wheel.