Dynamic

Bottom-Up Integration vs Sandwich Integration

Developers should use Bottom-Up Integration when working on systems with well-defined, independent lower-level modules, as it allows early detection of defects in core functionalities and reduces the risk of cascading failures in higher layers meets developers should use sandwich integration when working on complex systems with well-defined middle layers, such as in modular or layered architectures, to efficiently test integration points without waiting for all components to be complete. Here's our take.

🧊Nice Pick

Bottom-Up Integration

Developers should use Bottom-Up Integration when working on systems with well-defined, independent lower-level modules, as it allows early detection of defects in core functionalities and reduces the risk of cascading failures in higher layers

Bottom-Up Integration

Nice Pick

Developers should use Bottom-Up Integration when working on systems with well-defined, independent lower-level modules, as it allows early detection of defects in core functionalities and reduces the risk of cascading failures in higher layers

Pros

  • +It is particularly useful in projects where low-level components are critical to system performance or when top-level modules are not yet available for testing, such as in parallel development environments or when using stub drivers is impractical
  • +Related to: integration-testing, unit-testing

Cons

  • -Specific tradeoffs depend on your use case

Sandwich Integration

Developers should use Sandwich Integration when working on complex systems with well-defined middle layers, such as in modular or layered architectures, to efficiently test integration points without waiting for all components to be complete

Pros

  • +It is particularly useful in projects where both high-level and low-level modules are developed concurrently, as it allows parallel testing and reduces stubs and drivers compared to pure top-down or bottom-up approaches
  • +Related to: integration-testing, top-down-testing

Cons

  • -Specific tradeoffs depend on your use case

The Verdict

Use Bottom-Up Integration if: You want it is particularly useful in projects where low-level components are critical to system performance or when top-level modules are not yet available for testing, such as in parallel development environments or when using stub drivers is impractical and can live with specific tradeoffs depend on your use case.

Use Sandwich Integration if: You prioritize it is particularly useful in projects where both high-level and low-level modules are developed concurrently, as it allows parallel testing and reduces stubs and drivers compared to pure top-down or bottom-up approaches over what Bottom-Up Integration offers.

🧊
The Bottom Line
Bottom-Up Integration wins

Developers should use Bottom-Up Integration when working on systems with well-defined, independent lower-level modules, as it allows early detection of defects in core functionalities and reduces the risk of cascading failures in higher layers

Disagree with our pick? nice@nicepick.dev