Browser Support vs Progressive Enhancement
Developers should prioritize browser support to maximize accessibility and reach for web projects, as users employ diverse browsers like Chrome, Firefox, Safari, and Edge meets developers should use progressive enhancement when building websites or applications that need to reach a broad audience, including users on older browsers, low-bandwidth connections, or assistive technologies. Here's our take.
Browser Support
Developers should prioritize browser support to maximize accessibility and reach for web projects, as users employ diverse browsers like Chrome, Firefox, Safari, and Edge
Browser Support
Nice PickDevelopers should prioritize browser support to maximize accessibility and reach for web projects, as users employ diverse browsers like Chrome, Firefox, Safari, and Edge
Pros
- +It is essential for cross-platform compatibility, especially in enterprise or public-facing applications where user choice varies
- +Related to: html, css
Cons
- -Specific tradeoffs depend on your use case
Progressive Enhancement
Developers should use Progressive Enhancement when building websites or applications that need to reach a broad audience, including users on older browsers, low-bandwidth connections, or assistive technologies
Pros
- +It's crucial for ensuring accessibility compliance, improving SEO through semantic HTML, and creating robust applications that degrade gracefully when advanced features fail
- +Related to: semantic-html, responsive-web-design
Cons
- -Specific tradeoffs depend on your use case
The Verdict
These tools serve different purposes. Browser Support is a concept while Progressive Enhancement is a methodology. We picked Browser Support based on overall popularity, but your choice depends on what you're building.
Based on overall popularity. Browser Support is more widely used, but Progressive Enhancement excels in its own space.
Disagree with our pick? nice@nicepick.dev