Bundling vs Manual Script Tag Inclusion

Developers should use bundling when building modern web applications to enhance load times, manage dependencies, and support modular development meets developers should learn this technique when working with legacy codebases, simple static websites, or environments where build tools are impractical, such as quick prototypes or educational examples. Here's our take.

Bundling

Nice Pick

Developers should use bundling when building modern web applications to enhance load times, manage dependencies, and support modular development

Pros

• It is essential for production deployments to minimize file sizes and optimize resource delivery, especially in single-page applications (SPAs) and large-scale projects
• Related to: webpack, vite

Cons

• Specific tradeoffs depend on your use case

Manual Script Tag Inclusion

Developers should learn this technique when working with legacy codebases, simple static websites, or environments where build tools are impractical, such as quick prototypes or educational examples

Pros

• It's also useful for understanding the fundamentals of how browsers load and execute JavaScript, which helps debug issues in more complex modern setups
• Related to: html, javascript

Cons

• Specific tradeoffs depend on your use case

The Verdict

These tools serve different purposes. Bundling is a tool while Manual Script Tag Inclusion is a methodology. We picked Bundling based on overall popularity, but your choice depends on what you're building.

The Bottom Line

Bundling wins

Based on overall popularity. Bundling is more widely used, but Manual Script Tag Inclusion excels in its own space.