Dynamic

Cabal Repl vs GHCi

Developers should use Cabal Repl when working on Haskell projects that use Cabal for dependency management and building, as it provides a convenient way to interactively test code snippets, inspect types, and debug functions within the context of the entire project meets developers should use ghci when working with haskell for rapid prototyping, debugging, and exploring language features without the overhead of compiling full programs. Here's our take.

🧊Nice Pick

Cabal Repl

Developers should use Cabal Repl when working on Haskell projects that use Cabal for dependency management and building, as it provides a convenient way to interactively test code snippets, inspect types, and debug functions within the context of the entire project

Cabal Repl

Nice Pick

Developers should use Cabal Repl when working on Haskell projects that use Cabal for dependency management and building, as it provides a convenient way to interactively test code snippets, inspect types, and debug functions within the context of the entire project

Pros

  • +It is particularly useful during development phases for rapid prototyping, verifying module imports, and experimenting with library APIs without needing to compile the entire project repeatedly
  • +Related to: haskell, cabal

Cons

  • -Specific tradeoffs depend on your use case

GHCi

Developers should use GHCi when working with Haskell for rapid prototyping, debugging, and exploring language features without the overhead of compiling full programs

Pros

  • +It is particularly useful for functional programming tasks, algorithm testing, and educational purposes where immediate feedback is valuable
  • +Related to: haskell, functional-programming

Cons

  • -Specific tradeoffs depend on your use case

The Verdict

Use Cabal Repl if: You want it is particularly useful during development phases for rapid prototyping, verifying module imports, and experimenting with library apis without needing to compile the entire project repeatedly and can live with specific tradeoffs depend on your use case.

Use GHCi if: You prioritize it is particularly useful for functional programming tasks, algorithm testing, and educational purposes where immediate feedback is valuable over what Cabal Repl offers.

🧊
The Bottom Line
Cabal Repl wins

Developers should use Cabal Repl when working on Haskell projects that use Cabal for dependency management and building, as it provides a convenient way to interactively test code snippets, inspect types, and debug functions within the context of the entire project

Disagree with our pick? nice@nicepick.dev