Dynamic

Caddy vs Traefik

Developers should use Caddy when they need a lightweight, secure web server that simplifies HTTPS setup, especially for small to medium projects, static sites, or microservices meets developers should use traefik when building microservices architectures or deploying applications in containerized environments, as it simplifies routing and load balancing without manual configuration. Here's our take.

🧊Nice Pick

Caddy

Developers should use Caddy when they need a lightweight, secure web server that simplifies HTTPS setup, especially for small to medium projects, static sites, or microservices

Caddy

Nice Pick

Developers should use Caddy when they need a lightweight, secure web server that simplifies HTTPS setup, especially for small to medium projects, static sites, or microservices

Pros

  • +It's ideal for scenarios requiring automatic certificate management, such as rapid prototyping, development environments, or deployments where security and ease of use are priorities over advanced customization
  • +Related to: go, https

Cons

  • -Specific tradeoffs depend on your use case

Traefik

Developers should use Traefik when building microservices architectures or deploying applications in containerized environments, as it simplifies routing and load balancing without manual configuration

Pros

  • +It's particularly valuable for Kubernetes deployments, where it integrates seamlessly with Ingress resources, and for Docker setups, where it auto-detects containers
  • +Related to: kubernetes, docker

Cons

  • -Specific tradeoffs depend on your use case

The Verdict

Use Caddy if: You want it's ideal for scenarios requiring automatic certificate management, such as rapid prototyping, development environments, or deployments where security and ease of use are priorities over advanced customization and can live with specific tradeoffs depend on your use case.

Use Traefik if: You prioritize it's particularly valuable for kubernetes deployments, where it integrates seamlessly with ingress resources, and for docker setups, where it auto-detects containers over what Caddy offers.

🧊
The Bottom Line
Caddy wins

Developers should use Caddy when they need a lightweight, secure web server that simplifies HTTPS setup, especially for small to medium projects, static sites, or microservices

Disagree with our pick? nice@nicepick.dev