Centralized Social Media vs ActivityPub

Developers should learn about centralized social media when building applications that integrate with popular platforms via APIs (e meets developers should learn activitypub when building or integrating social features that require decentralization, user data ownership, and cross-platform communication, such as in open-source social networks, community platforms, or privacy-focused applications. Here's our take.

Centralized Social Media

Nice Pick

Developers should learn about centralized social media when building applications that integrate with popular platforms via APIs (e

Pros

• g
• Related to: api-integration, user-authentication

Cons

• Specific tradeoffs depend on your use case

ActivityPub

Developers should learn ActivityPub when building or integrating social features that require decentralization, user data ownership, and cross-platform communication, such as in open-source social networks, community platforms, or privacy-focused applications

Pros

• It's particularly useful for projects aiming to avoid vendor lock-in, enhance user autonomy, or comply with regulations like GDPR by enabling data portability and server independence
• Related to: mastodon, decentralized-web

Cons

• Specific tradeoffs depend on your use case

The Verdict

These tools serve different purposes. Centralized Social Media is a platform while ActivityPub is a protocol. We picked Centralized Social Media based on overall popularity, but your choice depends on what you're building.

The Bottom Line

Centralized Social Media wins

Based on overall popularity. Centralized Social Media is more widely used, but ActivityPub excels in its own space.