Certificate Manager vs Let's Encrypt

Developers should use Certificate Manager when deploying web applications that require HTTPS encryption, as it automates certificate management and reduces manual errors meets developers should use let's encrypt when they need to implement https on websites or web applications quickly and at no cost, especially for personal projects, small businesses, or development environments. Here's our take.

Certificate Manager

Nice Pick

Developers should use Certificate Manager when deploying web applications that require HTTPS encryption, as it automates certificate management and reduces manual errors

Pros

• It is particularly valuable in cloud-native environments, microservices architectures, and DevOps pipelines where scalability and security are critical, such as for e-commerce sites, APIs, or internal services
• Related to: ssl-tls, cloud-security

Cons

• Specific tradeoffs depend on your use case

Let's Encrypt

Developers should use Let's Encrypt when they need to implement HTTPS on websites or web applications quickly and at no cost, especially for personal projects, small businesses, or development environments

Pros

• It is ideal for automating certificate issuance and renewal in DevOps workflows, such as with web servers like Apache or Nginx, to ensure continuous security without manual intervention
• Related to: ssl-tls, https

Cons

• Specific tradeoffs depend on your use case

The Verdict

These tools serve different purposes. Certificate Manager is a platform while Let's Encrypt is a tool. We picked Certificate Manager based on overall popularity, but your choice depends on what you're building.

The Bottom Line

Certificate Manager wins

Based on overall popularity. Certificate Manager is more widely used, but Let's Encrypt excels in its own space.