Change Control vs Continuous Deployment Without Gates
Developers should learn and use Change Control when working in regulated industries (e meets developers should use this methodology when aiming for high deployment velocity, such as in fast-paced startups, saas products, or teams practicing devops. Here's our take.
Change Control
Developers should learn and use Change Control when working in regulated industries (e
Change Control
Nice PickDevelopers should learn and use Change Control when working in regulated industries (e
Pros
- +g
- +Related to: devops, itil
Cons
- -Specific tradeoffs depend on your use case
Continuous Deployment Without Gates
Developers should use this methodology when aiming for high deployment velocity, such as in fast-paced startups, SaaS products, or teams practicing DevOps
Pros
- +It is ideal for applications with robust automated test suites, comprehensive monitoring, and feature flagging capabilities, allowing safe and immediate delivery of value to users
- +Related to: continuous-integration, automated-testing
Cons
- -Specific tradeoffs depend on your use case
The Verdict
Use Change Control if: You want g and can live with specific tradeoffs depend on your use case.
Use Continuous Deployment Without Gates if: You prioritize it is ideal for applications with robust automated test suites, comprehensive monitoring, and feature flagging capabilities, allowing safe and immediate delivery of value to users over what Change Control offers.
Developers should learn and use Change Control when working in regulated industries (e
Disagree with our pick? nice@nicepick.dev