Dynamic

Checkov vs Terrascan

Developers should use Checkov when working with Infrastructure as Code to ensure security best practices are followed and to catch misconfigurations early in the development lifecycle meets developers should use terrascan when working with infrastructure as code to ensure security and compliance in cloud environments, such as aws, azure, or gcp, by catching issues early in the development cycle. Here's our take.

🧊Nice Pick

Checkov

Developers should use Checkov when working with Infrastructure as Code to ensure security best practices are followed and to catch misconfigurations early in the development lifecycle

Checkov

Nice Pick

Developers should use Checkov when working with Infrastructure as Code to ensure security best practices are followed and to catch misconfigurations early in the development lifecycle

Pros

  • +It is particularly valuable in DevOps and cloud-native environments for scanning Terraform or Kubernetes manifests, reducing the risk of data breaches or compliance violations
  • +Related to: terraform, kubernetes

Cons

  • -Specific tradeoffs depend on your use case

Terrascan

Developers should use Terrascan when working with Infrastructure as Code to ensure security and compliance in cloud environments, such as AWS, Azure, or GCP, by catching issues early in the development cycle

Pros

  • +It is particularly valuable for DevOps teams implementing shift-left security practices, as it reduces risks in production deployments by scanning IaC files during code commits or build processes
  • +Related to: terraform, kubernetes

Cons

  • -Specific tradeoffs depend on your use case

The Verdict

Use Checkov if: You want it is particularly valuable in devops and cloud-native environments for scanning terraform or kubernetes manifests, reducing the risk of data breaches or compliance violations and can live with specific tradeoffs depend on your use case.

Use Terrascan if: You prioritize it is particularly valuable for devops teams implementing shift-left security practices, as it reduces risks in production deployments by scanning iac files during code commits or build processes over what Checkov offers.

🧊
The Bottom Line
Checkov wins

Developers should use Checkov when working with Infrastructure as Code to ensure security best practices are followed and to catch misconfigurations early in the development lifecycle

Disagree with our pick? nice@nicepick.dev