Cilium vs Flannel

Developers should learn and use Cilium when deploying and managing Kubernetes clusters that require advanced networking features, such as service mesh capabilities, network security policies based on identity (e meets developers should use flannel when deploying kubernetes clusters that require a straightforward and reliable networking solution for pod-to-pod communication, especially in on-premises or cloud environments where native kubernetes networking is not available. Here's our take.

Cilium

Nice Pick

Developers should learn and use Cilium when deploying and managing Kubernetes clusters that require advanced networking features, such as service mesh capabilities, network security policies based on identity (e

Pros

• g
• Related to: kubernetes, ebpf

Cons

• Specific tradeoffs depend on your use case

Flannel

Developers should use Flannel when deploying Kubernetes clusters that require a straightforward and reliable networking solution for pod-to-pod communication, especially in on-premises or cloud environments where native Kubernetes networking is not available

Pros

• It is ideal for small to medium-sized clusters due to its simplicity and ease of setup, making it a popular choice for getting started with Kubernetes networking without complex configurations
• Related to: kubernetes, container-networking

Cons

• Specific tradeoffs depend on your use case

The Verdict

Use Cilium if: You want g and can live with specific tradeoffs depend on your use case.

Use Flannel if: You prioritize it is ideal for small to medium-sized clusters due to its simplicity and ease of setup, making it a popular choice for getting started with kubernetes networking without complex configurations over what Cilium offers.

The Bottom Line

Cilium wins

Developers should learn and use Cilium when deploying and managing Kubernetes clusters that require advanced networking features, such as service mesh capabilities, network security policies based on identity (e