Dynamic
CircleCI vs GitHub Actions
The CI/CD platform that's so reliable, you'll forget it's there until it breaks meets github actions. Here's our take.
🧊Nice Pick
CircleCI
The CI/CD platform that's so reliable, you'll forget it's there until it breaks.
CircleCI
Nice PickThe CI/CD platform that's so reliable, you'll forget it's there until it breaks.
Pros
- +Orbs make reusing configs across projects a breeze
- +Native Docker support for consistent build environments
- +Parallel job execution speeds up your pipelines
- +Integrates seamlessly with GitHub and Bitbucket
Cons
- -Pricing can get steep for teams with heavy usage
- -YAML configs can become unwieldy for complex workflows
GitHub Actions
Pros
Cons
The Verdict
Use CircleCI if: You want orbs make reusing configs across projects a breeze and can live with pricing can get steep for teams with heavy usage.
Use GitHub Actions if: You prioritize its strengths over what CircleCI offers.
🧊
The Bottom Line
CircleCI wins
The CI/CD platform that's so reliable, you'll forget it's there until it breaks.
Disagree with our pick? nice@nicepick.dev