Dynamic

CircleCI vs GitHub Actions

The CI/CD platform that's so reliable, you'll forget it's there until it breaks meets github actions. Here's our take.

🧊Nice Pick

CircleCI

The CI/CD platform that's so reliable, you'll forget it's there until it breaks.

CircleCI

Nice Pick

The CI/CD platform that's so reliable, you'll forget it's there until it breaks.

Pros

  • +Orbs make reusing configs across projects a breeze
  • +Native Docker support for consistent build environments
  • +Parallel job execution speeds up your pipelines
  • +Integrates seamlessly with GitHub and Bitbucket

Cons

  • -Pricing can get steep for teams with heavy usage
  • -YAML configs can become unwieldy for complex workflows

GitHub Actions

Pros

    Cons

      The Verdict

      Use CircleCI if: You want orbs make reusing configs across projects a breeze and can live with pricing can get steep for teams with heavy usage.

      Use GitHub Actions if: You prioritize its strengths over what CircleCI offers.

      🧊
      The Bottom Line
      CircleCI wins

      The CI/CD platform that's so reliable, you'll forget it's there until it breaks.

      Disagree with our pick? nice@nicepick.dev