Citizen Development vs Traditional Software Development

Developers should learn about Citizen Development to collaborate effectively with citizen developers, integrate their applications into broader IT ecosystems, and ensure security and compliance meets developers should learn traditional software development for projects with stable, well-defined requirements, such as government contracts, safety-critical systems (e. Here's our take.

Citizen Development

Nice Pick

Developers should learn about Citizen Development to collaborate effectively with citizen developers, integrate their applications into broader IT ecosystems, and ensure security and compliance

Pros

• It's particularly useful in organizations aiming to democratize software creation, reduce development backlogs, and foster innovation from non-IT staff
• Related to: low-code-platforms, no-code-platforms

Cons

• Specific tradeoffs depend on your use case

Traditional Software Development

Developers should learn Traditional Software Development for projects with stable, well-defined requirements, such as government contracts, safety-critical systems (e

Pros

• g
• Related to: waterfall-model, software-development-life-cycle

Cons

• Specific tradeoffs depend on your use case

The Verdict

Use Citizen Development if: You want it's particularly useful in organizations aiming to democratize software creation, reduce development backlogs, and foster innovation from non-it staff and can live with specific tradeoffs depend on your use case.

Use Traditional Software Development if: You prioritize g over what Citizen Development offers.

The Bottom Line

Citizen Development wins

Developers should learn about Citizen Development to collaborate effectively with citizen developers, integrate their applications into broader IT ecosystems, and ensure security and compliance