Dynamic

Claude vs GitHub Copilot

The one that actually gets nuance meets the og. Here's our take.

🧊Nice Pick

Claude

The one that actually gets nuance. And doesn't hallucinate your API docs.

Claude

Nice Pick

The one that actually gets nuance. And doesn't hallucinate your API docs.

Pros

  • +200K context window
  • +Excellent at code
  • +Nuanced reasoning
  • +Less hallucination

Cons

  • -No plugins/browsing
  • -Can be verbose
  • -Pricier API

GitHub Copilot

The OG. Reliable inline completions, but Cursor does more.

Pros

  • +Fast completions
  • +Inline suggestions
  • +GitHub integration
  • +Mature product

Cons

  • -No codebase context
  • -Single file focus
  • -Less intelligent edits

The Verdict

These tools serve different purposes. Claude is a ai assistants while GitHub Copilot is a ai coding tools. We picked Claude based on overall popularity, but your choice depends on what you're building.

🧊
The Bottom Line
Claude wins

Based on overall popularity. Claude is more widely used, but GitHub Copilot excels in its own space.

Learn about Claude →Learn about GitHub Copilot →

Disagree with our pick? nice@nicepick.dev