Client-Side Routing vs Static Site Generation

Developers should learn client-side routing when building modern single-page applications (SPAs) with frameworks like React, Angular, or Vue meets developers should use ssg for content-heavy sites like blogs, documentation, portfolios, and marketing pages where content changes infrequently, as it offers superior performance, security (no server-side vulnerabilities), and low hosting costs. Here's our take.

Client-Side Routing

Nice Pick

Developers should learn client-side routing when building modern single-page applications (SPAs) with frameworks like React, Angular, or Vue

Pros

• js, as it enables faster navigation, reduces server load, and improves perceived performance by avoiding full page refreshes
• Related to: single-page-applications, react-router

Cons

• Specific tradeoffs depend on your use case

Static Site Generation

Developers should use SSG for content-heavy sites like blogs, documentation, portfolios, and marketing pages where content changes infrequently, as it offers superior performance, security (no server-side vulnerabilities), and low hosting costs

Pros

• It's ideal for projects requiring SEO optimization, global scalability via CDNs, and simplified deployment workflows, especially when combined with modern frameworks like Next
• Related to: next-js, gatsby

Cons

• Specific tradeoffs depend on your use case

The Verdict

These tools serve different purposes. Client-Side Routing is a concept while Static Site Generation is a methodology. We picked Client-Side Routing based on overall popularity, but your choice depends on what you're building.

The Bottom Line

Client-Side Routing wins

Based on overall popularity. Client-Side Routing is more widely used, but Static Site Generation excels in its own space.