Cloud Load Balancer vs Reverse Proxy

Developers should use cloud load balancers when building scalable web applications, APIs, or microservices that require high availability and can handle variable traffic loads meets developers should use a reverse proxy when deploying web applications to distribute traffic across multiple servers, offload ssl encryption, cache static content, and protect against attacks like ddos. Here's our take.

Cloud Load Balancer

Nice Pick

Developers should use cloud load balancers when building scalable web applications, APIs, or microservices that require high availability and can handle variable traffic loads

Pros

• They are essential for distributing traffic across multiple instances in auto-scaling groups, enabling zero-downtime deployments through health checks and traffic shifting, and improving performance with features like SSL termination and content-based routing
• Related to: cloud-computing, auto-scaling

Cons

• Specific tradeoffs depend on your use case

Reverse Proxy

Developers should use a reverse proxy when deploying web applications to distribute traffic across multiple servers, offload SSL encryption, cache static content, and protect against attacks like DDoS

Pros

• It's essential for high-availability setups, microservices architectures, and scenarios requiring centralized logging or authentication, such as in cloud deployments or containerized environments
• Related to: nginx, apache-http-server

Cons

• Specific tradeoffs depend on your use case

The Verdict

These tools serve different purposes. Cloud Load Balancer is a platform while Reverse Proxy is a tool. We picked Cloud Load Balancer based on overall popularity, but your choice depends on what you're building.

The Bottom Line

Cloud Load Balancer wins

Based on overall popularity. Cloud Load Balancer is more widely used, but Reverse Proxy excels in its own space.