Cloud Native Monitoring Services vs Self-Hosted Monitoring

Developers should learn and use cloud native monitoring services when building or maintaining applications in cloud environments, especially with microservices or containerized deployments, to detect issues quickly, ensure high availability, and meet service-level objectives (SLOs) meets developers should learn and use self-hosted monitoring when they need to maintain data sovereignty, comply with strict regulatory requirements (e. Here's our take.

Cloud Native Monitoring Services

Nice Pick

Developers should learn and use cloud native monitoring services when building or maintaining applications in cloud environments, especially with microservices or containerized deployments, to detect issues quickly, ensure high availability, and meet service-level objectives (SLOs)

Pros

• These services are essential for DevOps and SRE practices, enabling proactive troubleshooting, cost optimization, and compliance in scalable, automated infrastructures
• Related to: prometheus, grafana

Cons

• Specific tradeoffs depend on your use case

Self-Hosted Monitoring

Developers should learn and use self-hosted monitoring when they need to maintain data sovereignty, comply with strict regulatory requirements (e

Pros

• g
• Related to: prometheus, grafana

Cons

• Specific tradeoffs depend on your use case

The Verdict

These tools serve different purposes. Cloud Native Monitoring Services is a platform while Self-Hosted Monitoring is a tool. We picked Cloud Native Monitoring Services based on overall popularity, but your choice depends on what you're building.

The Bottom Line

Cloud Native Monitoring Services wins

Based on overall popularity. Cloud Native Monitoring Services is more widely used, but Self-Hosted Monitoring excels in its own space.