Dynamic

CMake vs Meson

Developers should learn CMake when working on C, C++, or other compiled language projects that need to be built on multiple platforms (e meets developers should learn meson when working on medium to large c/c++ projects that require efficient, cross-platform builds, as it reduces configuration complexity and speeds up compilation times. Here's our take.

🧊Nice Pick

CMake

Developers should learn CMake when working on C, C++, or other compiled language projects that need to be built on multiple platforms (e

CMake

Nice Pick

Developers should learn CMake when working on C, C++, or other compiled language projects that need to be built on multiple platforms (e

Pros

  • +g
  • +Related to: c-plus-plus, make

Cons

  • -Specific tradeoffs depend on your use case

Meson

Developers should learn Meson when working on medium to large C/C++ projects that require efficient, cross-platform builds, as it reduces configuration complexity and speeds up compilation times

Pros

  • +It is particularly useful in open-source software development, embedded systems, and game engines where build performance and portability are critical
  • +Related to: ninja, cmake

Cons

  • -Specific tradeoffs depend on your use case

The Verdict

Use CMake if: You want g and can live with specific tradeoffs depend on your use case.

Use Meson if: You prioritize it is particularly useful in open-source software development, embedded systems, and game engines where build performance and portability are critical over what CMake offers.

🧊
The Bottom Line
CMake wins

Developers should learn CMake when working on C, C++, or other compiled language projects that need to be built on multiple platforms (e

Disagree with our pick? nice@nicepick.dev