CMS Platforms vs Static Site Generator

Developers should learn CMS platforms when building content-heavy websites, blogs, or e-commerce sites for clients or organizations that need easy content updates and management meets developers should use static site generators for content-heavy websites like blogs, documentation, portfolios, and marketing sites where content changes infrequently. Here's our take.

CMS Platforms

Nice Pick

Developers should learn CMS platforms when building content-heavy websites, blogs, or e-commerce sites for clients or organizations that need easy content updates and management

Pros

• They are essential for projects requiring rapid deployment, scalability, and non-technical user involvement, as they reduce development time and allow for customization through themes and plugins
• Related to: wordpress, drupal

Cons

• Specific tradeoffs depend on your use case

Static Site Generator

Developers should use Static Site Generators for content-heavy websites like blogs, documentation, portfolios, and marketing sites where content changes infrequently

Pros

• They are ideal when performance, security, and low hosting costs are priorities, as static files reduce server load and vulnerabilities compared to dynamic server-rendered sites
• Related to: markdown, git

Cons

• Specific tradeoffs depend on your use case

The Verdict

These tools serve different purposes. CMS Platforms is a platform while Static Site Generator is a tool. We picked CMS Platforms based on overall popularity, but your choice depends on what you're building.

The Bottom Line

CMS Platforms wins

Based on overall popularity. CMS Platforms is more widely used, but Static Site Generator excels in its own space.