CockroachDB vs Azure Database for MySQL

The cockroach of databases: hard to kill, spreads everywhere, and surprisingly good at SQL meets mysql with a microsoft hug—managed so you don't have to babysit your database. Here's our take.

CockroachDB

Nice Pick

The cockroach of databases: hard to kill, spreads everywhere, and surprisingly good at SQL.

Pros

• Strong consistency across distributed nodes without manual sharding
• PostgreSQL wire protocol compatibility for easy migration
• Automatic data replication and rebalancing for high availability

Cons

• Higher latency compared to single-node databases due to distributed overhead
• Complex licensing and pricing can be a headache for scaling

Azure Database for MySQL

MySQL with a Microsoft hug—managed so you don't have to babysit your database.

Pros

• Fully managed with automated backups and patching
• High availability built-in with flexible server options
• Seamless integration with other Azure services
• Strong security features like encryption and firewall rules

Cons

• Can get pricey compared to self-hosted MySQL
• Limited control over underlying infrastructure

The Verdict

Use CockroachDB if: You want strong consistency across distributed nodes without manual sharding and can live with higher latency compared to single-node databases due to distributed overhead.

Use Azure Database for MySQL if: You prioritize fully managed with automated backups and patching over what CockroachDB offers.

The Bottom Line

CockroachDB wins

The cockroach of databases: hard to kill, spreads everywhere, and surprisingly good at SQL.