Dynamic
Cody vs Tabnine
Sourcegraph's AI meets the ai autocomplete that's either a lifesaver or a code-copier, depending on how much you trust it. Here's our take.
🧊Nice Pick
Cody
Sourcegraph's AI. Good codebase search, not as polished.
Cody
Nice PickSourcegraph's AI. Good codebase search, not as polished.
Pros
- +Codebase search
- +Enterprise-ready
- +Self-hosted option
Cons
- -Less refined
- -Smaller community
- -Fewer features
Tabnine
The AI autocomplete that's either a lifesaver or a code-copier, depending on how much you trust it.
Pros
- +Surprisingly accurate suggestions for common code patterns
- +Integrates seamlessly with VS Code, IntelliJ, and other popular IDEs
- +Speeds up boilerplate and repetitive coding tasks
- +Works offline with local models for privacy-conscious devs
Cons
- -Can suggest outdated or insecure code snippets from its training data
- -Free version is limited, and the paid plans are pricey for what you get
The Verdict
These tools serve different purposes. Cody is a ai coding tools while Tabnine is a devtools. We picked Cody based on overall popularity, but your choice depends on what you're building.
🧊
The Bottom Line
Cody wins
Based on overall popularity. Cody is more widely used, but Tabnine excels in its own space.
Disagree with our pick? nice@nicepick.dev