Dynamic

Cody vs Tabnine

Sourcegraph's AI meets the ai autocomplete that's either a lifesaver or a code-copier, depending on how much you trust it. Here's our take.

🧊Nice Pick

Cody

Sourcegraph's AI. Good codebase search, not as polished.

Cody

Nice Pick

Sourcegraph's AI. Good codebase search, not as polished.

Pros

  • +Codebase search
  • +Enterprise-ready
  • +Self-hosted option

Cons

  • -Less refined
  • -Smaller community
  • -Fewer features

Tabnine

The AI autocomplete that's either a lifesaver or a code-copier, depending on how much you trust it.

Pros

  • +Surprisingly accurate suggestions for common code patterns
  • +Integrates seamlessly with VS Code, IntelliJ, and other popular IDEs
  • +Speeds up boilerplate and repetitive coding tasks
  • +Works offline with local models for privacy-conscious devs

Cons

  • -Can suggest outdated or insecure code snippets from its training data
  • -Free version is limited, and the paid plans are pricey for what you get

The Verdict

These tools serve different purposes. Cody is a ai coding tools while Tabnine is a devtools. We picked Cody based on overall popularity, but your choice depends on what you're building.

🧊
The Bottom Line
Cody wins

Based on overall popularity. Cody is more widely used, but Tabnine excels in its own space.

Disagree with our pick? nice@nicepick.dev