COM Automation vs .NET Remoting
Developers should learn COM Automation when building applications that need to automate or integrate with other Windows software, like generating reports in Excel, creating documents in Word, or managing data in Access from a custom application meets developers should learn . Here's our take.
COM Automation
Developers should learn COM Automation when building applications that need to automate or integrate with other Windows software, like generating reports in Excel, creating documents in Word, or managing data in Access from a custom application
COM Automation
Nice PickDevelopers should learn COM Automation when building applications that need to automate or integrate with other Windows software, like generating reports in Excel, creating documents in Word, or managing data in Access from a custom application
Pros
- +It is particularly valuable for enterprise automation, legacy system integration, and scripting scenarios where direct control over COM-enabled applications is required
- +Related to: windows-api, vba
Cons
- -Specific tradeoffs depend on your use case
.NET Remoting
Developers should learn
Pros
- +NET Remoting primarily for maintaining or migrating legacy systems built on older
- +Related to: wcf, asp-net-web-api
Cons
- -Specific tradeoffs depend on your use case
The Verdict
These tools serve different purposes. COM Automation is a technology while .NET Remoting is a framework. We picked COM Automation based on overall popularity, but your choice depends on what you're building.
Based on overall popularity. COM Automation is more widely used, but .NET Remoting excels in its own space.
Disagree with our pick? nice@nicepick.dev