Dynamic
COM Interop vs P/Invoke
Developers should learn COM Interop when working on meets developers should learn p/invoke when building . Here's our take.
🧊Nice Pick
COM Interop
Developers should learn COM Interop when working on
COM Interop
Nice PickDevelopers should learn COM Interop when working on
Pros
- +NET projects that need to interact with legacy COM-based software, such as older Windows applications, ActiveX controls, or Office automation
- +Related to: .net-framework, csharp
Cons
- -Specific tradeoffs depend on your use case
P/Invoke
Developers should learn P/Invoke when building
Pros
- +NET applications that need to interact with native Windows APIs (e
- +Related to: csharp, dotnet-framework
Cons
- -Specific tradeoffs depend on your use case
The Verdict
Use COM Interop if: You want net projects that need to interact with legacy com-based software, such as older windows applications, activex controls, or office automation and can live with specific tradeoffs depend on your use case.
Use P/Invoke if: You prioritize net applications that need to interact with native windows apis (e over what COM Interop offers.
🧊
The Bottom Line
COM Interop wins
Developers should learn COM Interop when working on
Disagree with our pick? nice@nicepick.dev