Dynamic

COM Interop vs P/Invoke

Developers should learn COM Interop when working on meets developers should learn p/invoke when building . Here's our take.

🧊Nice Pick

COM Interop

Developers should learn COM Interop when working on

COM Interop

Nice Pick

Developers should learn COM Interop when working on

Pros

  • +NET projects that need to interact with legacy COM-based software, such as older Windows applications, ActiveX controls, or Office automation
  • +Related to: .net-framework, csharp

Cons

  • -Specific tradeoffs depend on your use case

P/Invoke

Developers should learn P/Invoke when building

Pros

  • +NET applications that need to interact with native Windows APIs (e
  • +Related to: csharp, dotnet-framework

Cons

  • -Specific tradeoffs depend on your use case

The Verdict

Use COM Interop if: You want net projects that need to interact with legacy com-based software, such as older windows applications, activex controls, or office automation and can live with specific tradeoffs depend on your use case.

Use P/Invoke if: You prioritize net applications that need to interact with native windows apis (e over what COM Interop offers.

🧊
The Bottom Line
COM Interop wins

Developers should learn COM Interop when working on

Disagree with our pick? nice@nicepick.dev