COM vs .NET
Developers should learn COM when working on legacy Windows applications, system-level programming, or integrating with Microsoft technologies like Office automation or Internet Explorer meets developers should learn . Here's our take.
COM
Developers should learn COM when working on legacy Windows applications, system-level programming, or integrating with Microsoft technologies like Office automation or Internet Explorer
COM
Nice PickDevelopers should learn COM when working on legacy Windows applications, system-level programming, or integrating with Microsoft technologies like Office automation or Internet Explorer
Pros
- +It's essential for maintaining or extending older Windows software, building COM-based APIs, or understanding low-level component architecture in Windows environments
- +Related to: windows-api, ole-automation
Cons
- -Specific tradeoffs depend on your use case
.NET
Developers should learn
Pros
- +NET for building enterprise-grade, scalable applications on Windows, Linux, and macOS, especially in corporate environments or for cloud-native development with Azure
- +Related to: c-sharp, asp-net-core
Cons
- -Specific tradeoffs depend on your use case
The Verdict
These tools serve different purposes. COM is a concept while .NET is a platform. We picked COM based on overall popularity, but your choice depends on what you're building.
Based on overall popularity. COM is more widely used, but .NET excels in its own space.
Disagree with our pick? nice@nicepick.dev