Dynamic

COM vs .NET

Developers should learn COM when working on legacy Windows applications, system-level programming, or integrating with Microsoft technologies like Office automation or Internet Explorer meets developers should learn . Here's our take.

🧊Nice Pick

COM

Developers should learn COM when working on legacy Windows applications, system-level programming, or integrating with Microsoft technologies like Office automation or Internet Explorer

COM

Nice Pick

Developers should learn COM when working on legacy Windows applications, system-level programming, or integrating with Microsoft technologies like Office automation or Internet Explorer

Pros

  • +It's essential for maintaining or extending older Windows software, building COM-based APIs, or understanding low-level component architecture in Windows environments
  • +Related to: windows-api, ole-automation

Cons

  • -Specific tradeoffs depend on your use case

.NET

Developers should learn

Pros

  • +NET for building enterprise-grade, scalable applications on Windows, Linux, and macOS, especially in corporate environments or for cloud-native development with Azure
  • +Related to: c-sharp, asp-net-core

Cons

  • -Specific tradeoffs depend on your use case

The Verdict

These tools serve different purposes. COM is a concept while .NET is a platform. We picked COM based on overall popularity, but your choice depends on what you're building.

🧊
The Bottom Line
COM wins

Based on overall popularity. COM is more widely used, but .NET excels in its own space.

Disagree with our pick? nice@nicepick.dev