COM vs CORBA

Developers should learn COM when working on legacy Windows applications, system-level programming, or integrating with Microsoft technologies like Office automation or Internet Explorer meets developers should learn corba when working on legacy enterprise systems, particularly in finance, telecommunications, or government sectors where interoperability between heterogeneous systems is critical. Here's our take.

COM

Nice Pick

Developers should learn COM when working on legacy Windows applications, system-level programming, or integrating with Microsoft technologies like Office automation or Internet Explorer

Pros

• It's essential for maintaining or extending older Windows software, building COM-based APIs, or understanding low-level component architecture in Windows environments
• Related to: windows-api, ole-automation

Cons

• Specific tradeoffs depend on your use case

CORBA

Developers should learn CORBA when working on legacy enterprise systems, particularly in finance, telecommunications, or government sectors where interoperability between heterogeneous systems is critical

Pros

• It is useful for building distributed applications that require language and platform independence, such as in large-scale integration projects or when maintaining older systems that rely on CORBA-based communication
• Related to: distributed-systems, interface-definition-language

Cons

• Specific tradeoffs depend on your use case

The Verdict

These tools serve different purposes. COM is a concept while CORBA is a platform. We picked COM based on overall popularity, but your choice depends on what you're building.

The Bottom Line

COM wins

Based on overall popularity. COM is more widely used, but CORBA excels in its own space.