Dynamic
CommonJS vs UMD
Developers should learn CommonJS when working with Node meets developers should use umd when creating javascript libraries that need to support both server-side (node. Here's our take.
🧊Nice Pick
CommonJS
Developers should learn CommonJS when working with Node
CommonJS
Nice PickDevelopers should learn CommonJS when working with Node
Pros
- +js or older JavaScript projects, as it was the default module system in Node
- +Related to: node-js, javascript
Cons
- -Specific tradeoffs depend on your use case
UMD
Developers should use UMD when creating JavaScript libraries that need to support both server-side (Node
Pros
- +js) and client-side (browser) usage, or when targeting environments with different module systems like AMD and CommonJS
- +Related to: javascript, commonjs
Cons
- -Specific tradeoffs depend on your use case
The Verdict
These tools serve different purposes. CommonJS is a concept while UMD is a tool. We picked CommonJS based on overall popularity, but your choice depends on what you're building.
🧊
The Bottom Line
CommonJS wins
Based on overall popularity. CommonJS is more widely used, but UMD excels in its own space.
Disagree with our pick? nice@nicepick.dev