Compliance Monitoring vs Manual Auditing

Developers should learn compliance monitoring when building applications in highly regulated sectors such as finance (e meets developers should use manual auditing when dealing with high-risk applications, such as financial systems or healthcare software, where errors can have severe consequences. Here's our take.

Compliance Monitoring

Nice Pick

Developers should learn compliance monitoring when building applications in highly regulated sectors such as finance (e

Pros

• g
• Related to: security-auditing, risk-management

Cons

• Specific tradeoffs depend on your use case

Manual Auditing

Developers should use manual auditing when dealing with high-risk applications, such as financial systems or healthcare software, where errors can have severe consequences

Pros

• It's essential for reviewing custom business logic, assessing security in sensitive areas like authentication, and ensuring regulatory compliance (e
• Related to: code-review, security-auditing

Cons

• Specific tradeoffs depend on your use case

The Verdict

Use Compliance Monitoring if: You want g and can live with specific tradeoffs depend on your use case.

Use Manual Auditing if: You prioritize it's essential for reviewing custom business logic, assessing security in sensitive areas like authentication, and ensuring regulatory compliance (e over what Compliance Monitoring offers.

The Bottom Line

Compliance Monitoring wins

Developers should learn compliance monitoring when building applications in highly regulated sectors such as finance (e