Component Object Model vs .NET

Developers should learn COM when working with legacy Windows systems, enterprise applications, or technologies built on it, such as Office automation, Windows shell extensions, or DirectX game development meets developers should learn . Here's our take.

Component Object Model

Nice Pick

Developers should learn COM when working with legacy Windows systems, enterprise applications, or technologies built on it, such as Office automation, Windows shell extensions, or DirectX game development

Pros

• It's essential for maintaining and extending older Windows software, integrating with Microsoft products, or understanding low-level Windows architecture, though modern development often uses newer alternatives like
• Related to: ole, activex

Cons

• Specific tradeoffs depend on your use case

.NET

Developers should learn

Pros

• NET for building enterprise-grade, scalable applications on Windows, Linux, and macOS, especially in corporate environments or for cloud-native development with Azure
• Related to: c-sharp, asp-net-core

Cons

• Specific tradeoffs depend on your use case

The Verdict

These tools serve different purposes. Component Object Model is a concept while .NET is a platform. We picked Component Object Model based on overall popularity, but your choice depends on what you're building.

The Bottom Line

Component Object Model wins

Based on overall popularity. Component Object Model is more widely used, but .NET excels in its own space.