Condition Based Maintenance vs Run To Failure
Developers should learn CBM when working on industrial IoT, predictive analytics, or asset management systems, as it enables the creation of software that processes sensor data to forecast equipment failures and automate maintenance alerts meets developers should consider run to failure for non-essential systems, prototypes, or low-risk components where downtime is acceptable and repair is straightforward. Here's our take.
Condition Based Maintenance
Developers should learn CBM when working on industrial IoT, predictive analytics, or asset management systems, as it enables the creation of software that processes sensor data to forecast equipment failures and automate maintenance alerts
Condition Based Maintenance
Nice PickDevelopers should learn CBM when working on industrial IoT, predictive analytics, or asset management systems, as it enables the creation of software that processes sensor data to forecast equipment failures and automate maintenance alerts
Pros
- +It is particularly useful in manufacturing, energy, and transportation sectors where unplanned downtime is costly, helping to extend equipment lifespan and reduce operational expenses
- +Related to: industrial-iot, predictive-analytics
Cons
- -Specific tradeoffs depend on your use case
Run To Failure
Developers should consider Run To Failure for non-essential systems, prototypes, or low-risk components where downtime is acceptable and repair is straightforward
Pros
- +It is useful in agile or lean development environments to avoid over-engineering and reduce maintenance overhead, such as in disposable infrastructure or during rapid experimentation phases
- +Related to: devops, agile-methodology
Cons
- -Specific tradeoffs depend on your use case
The Verdict
Use Condition Based Maintenance if: You want it is particularly useful in manufacturing, energy, and transportation sectors where unplanned downtime is costly, helping to extend equipment lifespan and reduce operational expenses and can live with specific tradeoffs depend on your use case.
Use Run To Failure if: You prioritize it is useful in agile or lean development environments to avoid over-engineering and reduce maintenance overhead, such as in disposable infrastructure or during rapid experimentation phases over what Condition Based Maintenance offers.
Developers should learn CBM when working on industrial IoT, predictive analytics, or asset management systems, as it enables the creation of software that processes sensor data to forecast equipment failures and automate maintenance alerts
Disagree with our pick? nice@nicepick.dev