Container Security Scanning vs Infrastructure as Code Scanning

Developers should use container security scanning to integrate security into the CI/CD pipeline, preventing vulnerable images from reaching production environments meets developers should use iac scanning to shift security left in the devops pipeline, catching issues early when they are cheaper and easier to fix. Here's our take.

Container Security Scanning

Nice Pick

Developers should use container security scanning to integrate security into the CI/CD pipeline, preventing vulnerable images from reaching production environments

Pros

• It is essential for compliance with standards like CIS benchmarks, reducing attack surfaces in microservices architectures, and maintaining trust in containerized applications, especially in regulated industries like finance or healthcare
• Related to: docker, kubernetes

Cons

• Specific tradeoffs depend on your use case

Infrastructure as Code Scanning

Developers should use IaC scanning to shift security left in the DevOps pipeline, catching issues early when they are cheaper and easier to fix

Pros

• It is critical for compliance-driven industries (e
• Related to: terraform, cloudformation

Cons

• Specific tradeoffs depend on your use case

The Verdict

Use Container Security Scanning if: You want it is essential for compliance with standards like cis benchmarks, reducing attack surfaces in microservices architectures, and maintaining trust in containerized applications, especially in regulated industries like finance or healthcare and can live with specific tradeoffs depend on your use case.

Use Infrastructure as Code Scanning if: You prioritize it is critical for compliance-driven industries (e over what Container Security Scanning offers.

The Bottom Line

Container Security Scanning wins

Developers should use container security scanning to integrate security into the CI/CD pipeline, preventing vulnerable images from reaching production environments