Dynamic

ContentEditable API vs Draft.js

Developers should learn the ContentEditable API when building applications that require rich text editing capabilities, such as content management systems, note-taking apps, or collaborative platforms like Google Docs meets developers should use draft. Here's our take.

🧊Nice Pick

ContentEditable API

Developers should learn the ContentEditable API when building applications that require rich text editing capabilities, such as content management systems, note-taking apps, or collaborative platforms like Google Docs

ContentEditable API

Nice Pick

Developers should learn the ContentEditable API when building applications that require rich text editing capabilities, such as content management systems, note-taking apps, or collaborative platforms like Google Docs

Pros

  • +It is essential for creating custom text editors with advanced formatting options, real-time collaboration features, or accessibility enhancements beyond standard textareas
  • +Related to: javascript, html5

Cons

  • -Specific tradeoffs depend on your use case

Draft.js

Developers should use Draft

Pros

  • +js when building complex text editors in React applications that require rich formatting, custom plugins, or real-time collaboration features, such as in content management systems, blogging platforms, or collaborative tools like Google Docs
  • +Related to: react, javascript

Cons

  • -Specific tradeoffs depend on your use case

The Verdict

These tools serve different purposes. ContentEditable API is a concept while Draft.js is a library. We picked ContentEditable API based on overall popularity, but your choice depends on what you're building.

🧊
The Bottom Line
ContentEditable API wins

Based on overall popularity. ContentEditable API is more widely used, but Draft.js excels in its own space.

Disagree with our pick? nice@nicepick.dev