Continuous Compliance Monitoring vs Manual Auditing
Developers should learn and use Continuous Compliance Monitoring when building applications in regulated industries like finance, healthcare, or government, where adherence to standards such as GDPR, HIPAA, or PCI-DSS is critical meets developers should use manual auditing when dealing with high-risk applications, such as financial systems or healthcare software, where errors can have severe consequences. Here's our take.
Continuous Compliance Monitoring
Developers should learn and use Continuous Compliance Monitoring when building applications in regulated industries like finance, healthcare, or government, where adherence to standards such as GDPR, HIPAA, or PCI-DSS is critical
Continuous Compliance Monitoring
Nice PickDevelopers should learn and use Continuous Compliance Monitoring when building applications in regulated industries like finance, healthcare, or government, where adherence to standards such as GDPR, HIPAA, or PCI-DSS is critical
Pros
- +It reduces the risk of non-compliance penalties by catching issues early in development, automating repetitive checks, and enabling faster deployments while maintaining security and legal requirements
- +Related to: devsecops, infrastructure-as-code
Cons
- -Specific tradeoffs depend on your use case
Manual Auditing
Developers should use manual auditing when dealing with high-risk applications, such as financial systems or healthcare software, where errors can have severe consequences
Pros
- +It's essential for reviewing custom business logic, assessing security in sensitive areas like authentication, and ensuring regulatory compliance (e
- +Related to: code-review, security-auditing
Cons
- -Specific tradeoffs depend on your use case
The Verdict
Use Continuous Compliance Monitoring if: You want it reduces the risk of non-compliance penalties by catching issues early in development, automating repetitive checks, and enabling faster deployments while maintaining security and legal requirements and can live with specific tradeoffs depend on your use case.
Use Manual Auditing if: You prioritize it's essential for reviewing custom business logic, assessing security in sensitive areas like authentication, and ensuring regulatory compliance (e over what Continuous Compliance Monitoring offers.
Developers should learn and use Continuous Compliance Monitoring when building applications in regulated industries like finance, healthcare, or government, where adherence to standards such as GDPR, HIPAA, or PCI-DSS is critical
Disagree with our pick? nice@nicepick.dev