Continuous Compliance vs Periodic Compliance Checks

Developers should learn and implement Continuous Compliance when working in regulated industries (e meets developers should implement periodic compliance checks to mitigate risks, avoid legal penalties, and maintain trust in applications handling sensitive data. Here's our take.

Continuous Compliance

Nice Pick

Developers should learn and implement Continuous Compliance when working in regulated industries (e

Pros

• g
• Related to: devsecops, ci-cd-pipelines

Cons

• Specific tradeoffs depend on your use case

Periodic Compliance Checks

Developers should implement Periodic Compliance Checks to mitigate risks, avoid legal penalties, and maintain trust in applications handling sensitive data

Pros

• For example, in software development, this includes checking for GDPR compliance in data handling, PCI DSS standards in payment systems, or internal security policies in cloud deployments
• Related to: regulatory-compliance, security-auditing

Cons

• Specific tradeoffs depend on your use case

The Verdict

Use Continuous Compliance if: You want g and can live with specific tradeoffs depend on your use case.

Use Periodic Compliance Checks if: You prioritize for example, in software development, this includes checking for gdpr compliance in data handling, pci dss standards in payment systems, or internal security policies in cloud deployments over what Continuous Compliance offers.

The Bottom Line

Continuous Compliance wins

Developers should learn and implement Continuous Compliance when working in regulated industries (e