Continuous Delivery vs Waterfall Development

Developers should adopt Continuous Delivery to accelerate software delivery, improve quality, and reduce deployment failures meets developers should learn waterfall development for projects with well-defined, unchanging requirements, such as in regulated industries (e. Here's our take.

Continuous Delivery

Nice Pick

Developers should adopt Continuous Delivery to accelerate software delivery, improve quality, and reduce deployment failures

Pros

• It's essential for teams practicing DevOps, microservices architectures, or cloud-native development where frequent updates are required
• Related to: continuous-integration, devops

Cons

• Specific tradeoffs depend on your use case

Waterfall Development

Developers should learn Waterfall Development for projects with well-defined, unchanging requirements, such as in regulated industries (e

Pros

• g
• Related to: software-development-life-cycle, project-management

Cons

• Specific tradeoffs depend on your use case

The Verdict

Use Continuous Delivery if: You want it's essential for teams practicing devops, microservices architectures, or cloud-native development where frequent updates are required and can live with specific tradeoffs depend on your use case.

Use Waterfall Development if: You prioritize g over what Continuous Delivery offers.

The Bottom Line

Continuous Delivery wins

Developers should adopt Continuous Delivery to accelerate software delivery, improve quality, and reduce deployment failures