Core Web Vitals vs Real User Monitoring

Developers should learn and use Core Web Vitals to optimize website performance for better user engagement, higher conversion rates, and improved SEO rankings meets developers should use rum to optimize web performance and improve user satisfaction by understanding real-world usage patterns, especially for customer-facing applications where slow load times can lead to high bounce rates. Here's our take.

Core Web Vitals

Nice Pick

Developers should learn and use Core Web Vitals to optimize website performance for better user engagement, higher conversion rates, and improved SEO rankings

Pros

• They are essential for web development projects where user experience is critical, such as e-commerce sites, content platforms, and progressive web apps
• Related to: web-performance, lighthouse

Cons

• Specific tradeoffs depend on your use case

Real User Monitoring

Developers should use RUM to optimize web performance and improve user satisfaction by understanding real-world usage patterns, especially for customer-facing applications where slow load times can lead to high bounce rates

Pros

• It is crucial for debugging issues that only occur in production environments, such as geographic latency problems or device-specific errors, enabling data-driven decisions for performance enhancements
• Related to: application-performance-monitoring, synthetic-monitoring

Cons

• Specific tradeoffs depend on your use case

The Verdict

These tools serve different purposes. Core Web Vitals is a concept while Real User Monitoring is a tool. We picked Core Web Vitals based on overall popularity, but your choice depends on what you're building.

The Bottom Line

Core Web Vitals wins

Based on overall popularity. Core Web Vitals is more widely used, but Real User Monitoring excels in its own space.