Crash Only Software vs Graceful Degradation
Developers should learn and apply Crash Only Software when building resilient, fault-tolerant systems, especially in cloud-native or microservices architectures where failures are inevitable meets developers should learn and apply graceful degradation when building applications that need to support a wide range of users, such as in enterprise environments, public websites, or regions with varying internet speeds and device capabilities. Here's our take.
Crash Only Software
Developers should learn and apply Crash Only Software when building resilient, fault-tolerant systems, especially in cloud-native or microservices architectures where failures are inevitable
Crash Only Software
Nice PickDevelopers should learn and apply Crash Only Software when building resilient, fault-tolerant systems, especially in cloud-native or microservices architectures where failures are inevitable
Pros
- +It is particularly useful for stateless services, such as web servers or API gateways, where restarting does not lead to data loss, simplifying error handling and reducing code complexity
- +Related to: fault-tolerance, microservices
Cons
- -Specific tradeoffs depend on your use case
Graceful Degradation
Developers should learn and apply graceful degradation when building applications that need to support a wide range of users, such as in enterprise environments, public websites, or regions with varying internet speeds and device capabilities
Pros
- +It is crucial for ensuring accessibility compliance, improving user experience in fallback scenarios, and maintaining functionality during network issues or browser incompatibilities, often used alongside progressive enhancement strategies
- +Related to: progressive-enhancement, web-accessibility
Cons
- -Specific tradeoffs depend on your use case
The Verdict
Use Crash Only Software if: You want it is particularly useful for stateless services, such as web servers or api gateways, where restarting does not lead to data loss, simplifying error handling and reducing code complexity and can live with specific tradeoffs depend on your use case.
Use Graceful Degradation if: You prioritize it is crucial for ensuring accessibility compliance, improving user experience in fallback scenarios, and maintaining functionality during network issues or browser incompatibilities, often used alongside progressive enhancement strategies over what Crash Only Software offers.
Developers should learn and apply Crash Only Software when building resilient, fault-tolerant systems, especially in cloud-native or microservices architectures where failures are inevitable
Disagree with our pick? nice@nicepick.dev