Cross-Platform AR/VR Frameworks vs WebXR

Developers should learn and use cross-platform AR/VR frameworks when building applications that need to reach a broad audience across different devices, such as mobile AR apps for both iOS and Android or VR experiences for multiple headset brands meets developers should learn webxr to build cross-platform xr applications that run in browsers, eliminating the need for app store distribution and reducing development overhead for multiple native platforms. Here's our take.

Cross-Platform AR/VR Frameworks

Nice Pick

Developers should learn and use cross-platform AR/VR frameworks when building applications that need to reach a broad audience across different devices, such as mobile AR apps for both iOS and Android or VR experiences for multiple headset brands

Pros

• They are essential for reducing development time and costs by enabling code reuse, while ensuring consistent performance and features across platforms
• Related to: unity, unreal-engine

Cons

• Specific tradeoffs depend on your use case

WebXR

Developers should learn WebXR to build cross-platform XR applications that run in browsers, eliminating the need for app store distribution and reducing development overhead for multiple native platforms

Pros

• It's ideal for creating interactive demos, educational tools, e-commerce previews, and social VR experiences that can be easily shared via links
• Related to: javascript, three-js

Cons

• Specific tradeoffs depend on your use case

The Verdict

These tools serve different purposes. Cross-Platform AR/VR Frameworks is a framework while WebXR is a platform. We picked Cross-Platform AR/VR Frameworks based on overall popularity, but your choice depends on what you're building.

The Bottom Line

Cross-Platform AR/VR Frameworks wins

Based on overall popularity. Cross-Platform AR/VR Frameworks is more widely used, but WebXR excels in its own space.