Cross-Platform Standards vs Native Development
Developers should learn and use cross-platform standards to build applications that reach a wider audience without platform-specific rewrites, reducing development time and costs meets developers should use native development when building applications that require maximum performance, deep integration with device features (e. Here's our take.
Cross-Platform Standards
Developers should learn and use cross-platform standards to build applications that reach a wider audience without platform-specific rewrites, reducing development time and costs
Cross-Platform Standards
Nice PickDevelopers should learn and use cross-platform standards to build applications that reach a wider audience without platform-specific rewrites, reducing development time and costs
Pros
- +This is crucial for web development, mobile apps (e
- +Related to: web-standards, responsive-design
Cons
- -Specific tradeoffs depend on your use case
Native Development
Developers should use native development when building applications that require maximum performance, deep integration with device features (e
Pros
- +g
- +Related to: swift, kotlin
Cons
- -Specific tradeoffs depend on your use case
The Verdict
These tools serve different purposes. Cross-Platform Standards is a concept while Native Development is a methodology. We picked Cross-Platform Standards based on overall popularity, but your choice depends on what you're building.
Based on overall popularity. Cross-Platform Standards is more widely used, but Native Development excels in its own space.
Disagree with our pick? nice@nicepick.dev