CSS3 vs Styled Components
Developers should learn CSS3 to build modern, responsive, and accessible websites that work across various devices and screen sizes meets developers should learn styled components when building react applications that require maintainable, scalable, and dynamic styling, especially in component-driven architectures. Here's our take.
CSS3
Developers should learn CSS3 to build modern, responsive, and accessible websites that work across various devices and screen sizes
CSS3
Nice PickDevelopers should learn CSS3 to build modern, responsive, and accessible websites that work across various devices and screen sizes
Pros
- +It is essential for front-end web development, allowing precise control over layout, typography, colors, and animations, which enhances user experience and performance by reducing the need for external libraries or complex scripts
- +Related to: html5, javascript
Cons
- -Specific tradeoffs depend on your use case
Styled Components
Developers should learn Styled Components when building React applications that require maintainable, scalable, and dynamic styling, especially in component-driven architectures
Pros
- +It is ideal for projects needing theme support, server-side rendering, or where CSS-in-JS benefits like colocation of styles and logic are prioritized
- +Related to: react, css-in-js
Cons
- -Specific tradeoffs depend on your use case
The Verdict
These tools serve different purposes. CSS3 is a language while Styled Components is a library. We picked CSS3 based on overall popularity, but your choice depends on what you're building.
Based on overall popularity. CSS3 is more widely used, but Styled Components excels in its own space.
Disagree with our pick? nice@nicepick.dev