Custom Identity Systems vs Okta

Developers should learn about custom identity systems when working in environments with unique compliance needs, legacy infrastructure, or specialized user management workflows that standard solutions cannot accommodate meets developers should learn okta when building applications that require robust user authentication, authorization, and identity management, especially in enterprise or b2b contexts where security and scalability are critical. Here's our take.

Custom Identity Systems

Nice Pick

Developers should learn about custom identity systems when working in environments with unique compliance needs, legacy infrastructure, or specialized user management workflows that standard solutions cannot accommodate

Pros

• They are particularly relevant for large enterprises, government agencies, or applications requiring granular control over identity data, such as in healthcare, finance, or custom B2B platforms
• Related to: authentication, authorization

Cons

• Specific tradeoffs depend on your use case

Okta

Developers should learn Okta when building applications that require robust user authentication, authorization, and identity management, especially in enterprise or B2B contexts where security and scalability are critical

Pros

• It is particularly useful for implementing SSO across multiple applications, integrating with third-party identity providers (e
• Related to: oauth-2.0, openid-connect

Cons

• Specific tradeoffs depend on your use case

The Verdict

These tools serve different purposes. Custom Identity Systems is a concept while Okta is a platform. We picked Custom Identity Systems based on overall popularity, but your choice depends on what you're building.

The Bottom Line

Custom Identity Systems wins

Based on overall popularity. Custom Identity Systems is more widely used, but Okta excels in its own space.