Custom String Formatting vs Template Literals

Developers should learn custom string formatting when they need precise control over text output, such as in data visualization, internationalization, or when standard formatting options are insufficient meets developers should use template literals whenever they need to create dynamic strings with variables or expressions, especially for generating html, sql queries, or formatted messages. Here's our take.

Custom String Formatting

Nice Pick

Developers should learn custom string formatting when they need precise control over text output, such as in data visualization, internationalization, or when standard formatting options are insufficient

Pros

• It is essential for creating readable logs, generating formatted documents like CSV or JSON, and ensuring consistent user-facing text in applications
• Related to: string-manipulation, regular-expressions

Cons

• Specific tradeoffs depend on your use case

Template Literals

Developers should use template literals whenever they need to create dynamic strings with variables or expressions, especially for generating HTML, SQL queries, or formatted messages

Pros

• They are essential for modern JavaScript development as they eliminate the need for cumbersome string concatenation with the + operator and make code more maintainable, particularly in frameworks like React for JSX-like syntax or in Node
• Related to: javascript, es6

Cons

• Specific tradeoffs depend on your use case

The Verdict

These tools serve different purposes. Custom String Formatting is a concept while Template Literals is a language. We picked Custom String Formatting based on overall popularity, but your choice depends on what you're building.

The Bottom Line

Custom String Formatting wins

Based on overall popularity. Custom String Formatting is more widely used, but Template Literals excels in its own space.