CVS vs Git
Developers should learn CVS primarily for maintaining or contributing to legacy projects that still use it, as it remains in use in some older systems and organizations meets git is widely used in the industry and worth learning. Here's our take.
CVS
Developers should learn CVS primarily for maintaining or contributing to legacy projects that still use it, as it remains in use in some older systems and organizations
CVS
Nice PickDevelopers should learn CVS primarily for maintaining or contributing to legacy projects that still use it, as it remains in use in some older systems and organizations
Pros
- +It provides foundational concepts in version control, such as branching, merging, and conflict resolution, which are transferable to newer tools
- +Related to: git, subversion
Cons
- -Specific tradeoffs depend on your use case
Git
Git is widely used in the industry and worth learning
Pros
- +Widely used in the industry
- +Related to: github, gitlab
Cons
- -Specific tradeoffs depend on your use case
The Verdict
Use CVS if: You want it provides foundational concepts in version control, such as branching, merging, and conflict resolution, which are transferable to newer tools and can live with specific tradeoffs depend on your use case.
Use Git if: You prioritize widely used in the industry over what CVS offers.
Developers should learn CVS primarily for maintaining or contributing to legacy projects that still use it, as it remains in use in some older systems and organizations
Disagree with our pick? nice@nicepick.dev