Dapper vs LINQ to SQL

Developers should use Dapper when they need fast database access with minimal abstraction, such as in high-performance web applications, microservices, or scenarios where raw SQL control is preferred meets developers should learn linq to sql when building . Here's our take.

Dapper

Nice Pick

Developers should use Dapper when they need fast database access with minimal abstraction, such as in high-performance web applications, microservices, or scenarios where raw SQL control is preferred

Pros

• It's ideal for projects requiring simple CRUD operations, complex queries, or when integrating with existing SQL-heavy codebases, as it reduces boilerplate while maintaining SQL transparency
• Related to: c-sharp, sql-server

Cons

• Specific tradeoffs depend on your use case

LINQ to SQL

Developers should learn LINQ to SQL when building

Pros

• NET applications that require efficient data access to SQL Server databases, as it simplifies database operations by eliminating much of the boilerplate SQL code
• Related to: csharp, sql-server

Cons

• Specific tradeoffs depend on your use case

The Verdict

These tools serve different purposes. Dapper is a library while LINQ to SQL is a framework. We picked Dapper based on overall popularity, but your choice depends on what you're building.

The Bottom Line

Dapper wins

Based on overall popularity. Dapper is more widely used, but LINQ to SQL excels in its own space.